Volume 49 Issue 06 July/August 2016
Research

Some Light Geometry

Of the two geometrical curiosities below, the first involves zero work and the second (almost) zero words.

<strong>Figure 1.</strong> Forces felt by the mass as one drags it up <em>AC</em> (with no acceleration) add up to zero. Thus, the resultant of the reaction of the ramp and the supplied force compensates the gravitational force. The triangle formed by these two forces is congruent to \({\Delta}\)<em>ABC</em>,  and thus the force one must apply is <em>b.</em> In short, \({\Delta}\)<em>ABC</em>  plays two roles, a geometrical one and a force one.
Figure 1. Forces felt by the mass as one drags it up AC (with no acceleration) add up to zero. Thus, the resultant of the reaction of the ramp and the supplied force compensates the gravitational force. The triangle formed by these two forces is congruent to \({\Delta}\)ABC, and thus the force one must apply is b. In short, \({\Delta}\)ABC plays two roles, a geometrical one and a force one.

1. This physical “proof” of the Pythagorean theorem involves no work – mechanical work, that is. Figure 1a shows a right triangle, its hypotenuse held vertical. We take a point mass of the same weight c as the length of the hypotenuse,1 so that \(c\) plays a double role of the length and of the weight. Lifting the mass along \(AB\) requires the same work as dragging it up the slippery ramps \(AC\) and \(CB\):

\[W_{AB}=W_{AC}+W_{CB}. \qquad (1)\]

Indeed, had the left-hand side been, say, smaller, we could have cycled the weight along the closed path \(ABCA,\) extracting more energy on the way down than we spent on the way up – a functioning perpetual motion machine.

<strong>Figure 2.</strong> <em>A</em> is the area of the parallelogram.
Figure 2. A is the area of the parallelogram.

Now \((1)\) gives the theorem, since \(W_{AB}=c\cdot c=c ^2,\) \(W_{AC}=b\cdot b = b ^2,\) and \(W_{CB}=a ^2,\) as explained by Figure 1 for \(W_{AC}.\) The Pythagorean theorem is thus one consequence of the constant vector field’s conservativeness.

2. A wordless proof of the formula \(\sin (\beta - \alpha) = \sin \beta  \cos \alpha  - \sin \alpha \cos \beta,\) referring to Figure 2, expresses the same area in two different ways:

\[A=1\cdot 1\cdot \sin ( \beta   -\alpha   ) = \\ \\
\left|\begin{array}{cc} \cos   \alpha  & \cos  \beta   \\ \sin  \alpha   & \sin \beta  \end{array} \right| = \\ \\
\sin \beta \cos \alpha  - \sin \alpha\cos \beta.\]

All figures in the article are provided by the author.

1 in some chosen units

About the Author